This
is a book that has been waiting most of my life for me to read it. It
was first published by Eyre and Spottiswoode in 1952. When I was in my
teens, I was in love with the idea of literature and reading, but
woefully unresourced and unsupported. We had few books at home, and
such classics as the school introduced us to were just what school
reading has always been: boring because you had to read them at the
pace of the rest of the class, and unappealing because teachers
required you to read them. But I remember seeing a list of books
recommended for young people who loved reading, and to encourage them
in that love. Top of the list was H. F. M. Prescott’s Man On A Donkey. But I had no idea how to get hold of it, and it never came my way.
It’s been in and out of print, though you can get it from Amazon.
Rowan Williams gave a Good Friday service of meditation based on it, at
one of the other churches in the deanery, shortly after he had been
made Bishop of Monmouth. I didn’t hear the addresses - I was doing my
own in the parish here - but I heard all about it, as you can imagine,
from the vicar. (Who became vicar of that parish not long after the
book was first published.)
Then, a few years ago, I found a copy of the book, in two volumes,
in the Castle Bookshop at Hay-on-Wye, and bought it for £15. I suppose
at that price it should be a first edition. It has stood on the shelf
in our quiet room ever since; until this year, just before coming on
holiday, Alison asked me to find Barbara Kingsolver’s Poisonwood Bible for her to read on holiday, and next to it was The Man On A Donkey. Calling out to me to become my holiday reading for this year.
It’s a historical novel set in the 1530s, when Henry VIII was
re-inventing himself from statesman and securer of the English State,
into monstrous paranoid tyrant, and despoiler of the Church. The
chronicle follows the lives of five principal characters, through the
years of the divorce of Katherine of Aragon and the marriages to Anne
Boleyn and later Jane Seymour. It culminates with an account of the
Pilgrimage of Grace, a popular uprising in the North which was a
protest against the dissolution of the monasteries and the destruction
of the Old Religion.
It is that rare thing: a Christian novel that is not unbearably
sentimental, or mawkishly pious, or theologically trivial. (Nowadays
what claims to be a “Christian novel” is usually intended to convert
the reader, or else is about the End of the World - interpreted,
naturally, solely on the basis of a fundamentalist reading of biblical
apocalyptic.) The Man On The Donkey is Christian because it doesn’t try
to preach or manipulate: it simply tells the truth. Its characters
inhabit an age of faith. Not that they are any better or worse than us
secular men and women: Christian orthodoxy and -praxis are just
something they take for granted. Yet Faith is also what shapes their
whole world of thinking and action, no matter what side they take in
the political conflicts of the day.
It portrays in convincing detail the agonies of conscience of those
who are torn apart by their loyalty to God or (mistakenly) to the King.
Robert Aske, the gentleman and lawyer who finds himself driven by God
and circumstance to be the leader of the uprising, reminds you of
Dietrich Bonhoeffer: forced into rebellion out of obedience to God,
even though he knows it will probably cost him his life, and may well
be counted as sin.
In his faith, obedience and suffering, Aske becomes a figure of the
Christ. Eventually betrayed by the King and his counsellors, the
clergy, the nobility, his former fellow Pilgrims, even his own family,
Aske is sentenced to be hanged in chains: a lingering form of death
taking over a week. And here he experiences the utter desolation of a
man, dying in extreme agony, whose life work has come to nothing.
And as his eye told him of the sickening depth below his
body, and as his mind foreknew the lagging endlessness of torment
before him, so, as if the lightning had brought an inner illumination
also, he knew the greater gulf of despair above which his spirit hung,
helpless and aghast.
God did not now, nor would in any furthest future, prevail. Once He
had come, and died. If He came again, again He would die, and again,
and so for ever, by His own will rendered powerless against the free
and evil wills of men.
Then Aske met the full assault of darkness without reprieve of hoped
for light, for God ultimately vanquished was no God at all. But yet,
though God was not God, as the head of the dumb worm turns, so his
spirit turned, blindly, gropingly, hopelessly loyal, towards that good,
that holy, that merciful, which though not God, though vanquished, was
still the last dear love of a vanquished and tortured man.
This is one of the most moving meditations I have ever come across,
on Jesus’ words from the cross: “My God, my God; why hast thou forsaken
me?”
Here’s a book which, if you can find a copy, is still well worth reading.